Fearless on my breath...

There's just nothing like a little misogyny from Neal Boortz to get the old heart pumping in the morning:

... Coulter is exactly right. Don't take her word for it, just read "Freedomnomics" by John Lott. Here we have a renowned economist going all the way back to the late 1980s to see what happens when women get the vote. His findings? In every single case, when women were given the right to vote the cost of government immediately began to rise as women, particularly single women, started voting for the candidates who would create more government spending programs designed to provide women with security. That magic word ... security.

Lott found that young single women overwhelmingly vote liberal. When they marry and start a family they start voting more conservatively. That would be because their sense of security is provided by their family, and they don't want government to interfere in their accumulation of wealth. Then, if that very same woman starts to feel that her marriage is threatened ... or if she becomes divorced ... she right back there voting for liberals again. Why? Security .. this time from the government instead of her husband.

Coulter is right. Deal with it ...

Now on one level I find it rather entertaining that Ann Coulter seems delighted at the prospect of losing her right to vote, but that's the only positive spin I can even try to put on this discussion. Much like the whole "to torture or not to torture" dialog I've gotta' say that I had really hoped that this subject, whether or not women should be allowed to vote, was off the table. But any day now I expect to hear some wingnut waxing hypothetical on the prospect of enslaving entire races of human beings again, how good it would be for the economy and how we'd really be doing said race a "favor". And after that it'll be a short hop, skip and a jump to cannibalism. Soylent Green, baby.

But I would just like to say, again, that trying to sum up an entire complex group of people under a simplistic overgeneralization that allows you to muse in a public forum about taking away their rights is about the lowest, most vile thing anyone can engage in. You want to know why I'm a liberal, Mr. Boortz? It has a helluva lot less to do with security than it does with wanting to be as far away from people like you politically as possible.

So Ann Coulter implies that John Edwards is a "faggot" at CPAC and people are surprised by this. No, really, they're actually surprised that she'd say this, as if she hasn't been jumping through higher and higher flaming hoops in a mad attempt to keep the rabid wingnuts drooling for more for years now. Of course now the same folks who spent last week telling us how potty-mouthed and angry the Left is are now doing their damnedest to distance themselves from Coulter. They're shocked, shocked to hear her use such vulgarity.

But fortunately for her she hasn't lost all of her admiring fans, and at the top of the list is...

...wait for it...

Jeff Gannon!

...I was in the room at CPAC when Ann said it. She was making a joke and it was funny. She was mocking the very process that is taking place right now -- political correctness run amok....

That "faggot" has become the new "N-word" is evidence of how far our culture has drifted. For decades, the "F-word" was the four-letter one you couldn't say on television, but now it's part of mainstream liberal vernacular. However, rallying behind a slur of their own, gays can take to the streets in their assless chaps and nipple piercings and skip the two centuries of slavery and a hundred years of separate lunch counters and drinking fountains to demand whatever they can extort from pandering politicians....

And the wingnut hordes still love them some Ann:

Ann called John Edwards a queer. Is it true? If it is he's dead meat. I can't believe Coulter would call Edwards a queer unless she knew he was. There would be no point in falsely calling him queer because he is not a serious contender.

The Left pays lip service to butt-bangers but when they can they show their disapproval of homosexuality. Look at how they tried to embarrass Dick Cheney because his daughter was a lesbian.

----

More so call "conservative" cry baby crap. Hey Cons, get a life and grow some balls. This liberal type stuff from our side is getting sickening.

----

Ann should apologize for the "faggot" comment just as soon as the leftwing moonbats apologize for their "Bush lied, people died, selected, not elected, no WMD . . . " and countless other far more offensive comments which get passed along and even rubber-stamped by our Kool-Aid drinking media whores.[Editor's note: We have to apologize for the fact that no WMD's were found? I...wha-?]

----

I think it is a sad day when we let faggots or the liberals tell us what we can an can't say. How did we get here?

...Ann I love you.