A few words about Deathly Hallows
Jul. 23rd, 2007 10:53 amOk so, book 7...
I would like to say that I didn't hate this book, per se, nor will I swear off all things Potter henceforth. I will undoubtedly remain a fan and I'm even looking forward to reading a lot of the fic this book inspires. Hell, I may write some of it myself.
However, I've seen a lot of people lining up to turn this book into a religious war and I would like to say that feeling the need to lead a crusade, possibly alienate friends and acquaintances, and act like a general ass about a work of fiction is, in a word, foolish. If you loved the book and thought it was the greatest thing ever written in the history of literature, hey, good on you. I'm delighted it worked for you, I truly am. I wish I could share the sentiment but I can't and no amount of strident pleas, logical arguments or pointing at critical response is going to change that.
If you hated the books and will never, ever, ever read another word in the Potter universe because JKR is not getting another cent of your money, well I'm very sorry. I mean I'm profoundly sad that we'll not be able to discuss the series in the future. But no matter of impassioned, angry rants, logical arguments or pointing at critical response is going to change my mind either.
There were some things in the book I enjoyed, though they were few and far between. There were some things in the book I would just as happily have skimmed over or skipped entirely had I been reading alone. There was a scene or two I loved, and several that I outright hated. Overall I found the book extremely disappointing, and I will admit I spent several days last week utterly depressed after I'd read the spoilers.
But you see I understand that this is my opinion about a work of literature. I do not expect anyone to share it, I don't look down on anyone who doesn't, and I expect the same respect from everyone else. I am entitled to my rational, emotional and literary responses to the work, and anyone who tries to say otherwise is every bit as bad as every other religious zealot out there. Your opinion is yours and you're welcome to it, just don't try and cram it down my throat.
Allow me to reiterate just for clarity's sake, anybody out there who alienates a single friend because of an opinion about this book is a fool. An absolute, unmitigated fool.
However I will say that if you liked the epilogue we probably should never discuss it. Seriously, just don't tell me. I don't want to know.
Now, I'd love to point you at Rexluscus' take on the Snape revelations in Book 7 which almost completely mirror my own. We differ on a couple of points, but her overall summary got me definitely nodding. Shouldn't need to say this, but there are spoilers.
Comments are definitely open and I'm delighted to hear everyone's take on the book.
UPDATE:
aelfsciene just sent me this very funny review of book 7 which I just had to share:
Page stillnonumbersbutafterthetableofcontents: A quote from Aeschylus and another quote from More Fruit of Solitude by William Penn. I am reminded of how Joe Queenan once suggested that if mediocre books were going to preface with quotes from great literature, how great literature could return the favour by prefacing themselves with quotes from Tom Clancy explaining the technical specifications of a military helicopter.
Read the rest, it's so worth it.
I would like to say that I didn't hate this book, per se, nor will I swear off all things Potter henceforth. I will undoubtedly remain a fan and I'm even looking forward to reading a lot of the fic this book inspires. Hell, I may write some of it myself.
However, I've seen a lot of people lining up to turn this book into a religious war and I would like to say that feeling the need to lead a crusade, possibly alienate friends and acquaintances, and act like a general ass about a work of fiction is, in a word, foolish. If you loved the book and thought it was the greatest thing ever written in the history of literature, hey, good on you. I'm delighted it worked for you, I truly am. I wish I could share the sentiment but I can't and no amount of strident pleas, logical arguments or pointing at critical response is going to change that.
If you hated the books and will never, ever, ever read another word in the Potter universe because JKR is not getting another cent of your money, well I'm very sorry. I mean I'm profoundly sad that we'll not be able to discuss the series in the future. But no matter of impassioned, angry rants, logical arguments or pointing at critical response is going to change my mind either.
There were some things in the book I enjoyed, though they were few and far between. There were some things in the book I would just as happily have skimmed over or skipped entirely had I been reading alone. There was a scene or two I loved, and several that I outright hated. Overall I found the book extremely disappointing, and I will admit I spent several days last week utterly depressed after I'd read the spoilers.
But you see I understand that this is my opinion about a work of literature. I do not expect anyone to share it, I don't look down on anyone who doesn't, and I expect the same respect from everyone else. I am entitled to my rational, emotional and literary responses to the work, and anyone who tries to say otherwise is every bit as bad as every other religious zealot out there. Your opinion is yours and you're welcome to it, just don't try and cram it down my throat.
Allow me to reiterate just for clarity's sake, anybody out there who alienates a single friend because of an opinion about this book is a fool. An absolute, unmitigated fool.
However I will say that if you liked the epilogue we probably should never discuss it. Seriously, just don't tell me. I don't want to know.
Now, I'd love to point you at Rexluscus' take on the Snape revelations in Book 7 which almost completely mirror my own. We differ on a couple of points, but her overall summary got me definitely nodding. Shouldn't need to say this, but there are spoilers.
Comments are definitely open and I'm delighted to hear everyone's take on the book.
UPDATE:
Page stillnonumbersbutafterthetableofcontents: A quote from Aeschylus and another quote from More Fruit of Solitude by William Penn. I am reminded of how Joe Queenan once suggested that if mediocre books were going to preface with quotes from great literature, how great literature could return the favour by prefacing themselves with quotes from Tom Clancy explaining the technical specifications of a military helicopter.
Read the rest, it's so worth it.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 10:52 pm (UTC)I was so delighted with Snape's dialogue in his flashback scenes. So glad that after the initial Lily-desperate stuff, he seemed to treat Dumbledore like an equal and a partner rather than a mentor. I was also happy that very subtle hints that Dumbledore wasn't /exactly/ the saint everybody thought he was turned out to have some relevance.
I think with the epilogue, while I was disappointed in '19 years later' and the kind of abrupt ending-on-day-of-victory thing, it wasn't a big deal other than my curiousity about this thing she'd written as her candybar scene 17 years ago. And as a candybar, it made me wonder if it was her candybar, or Harry's-- was it a representation of what SHE wanted, or what she promised herself she'd give Harry after being mean to him for so many years.
I don't know that there SHOULD have been apprehension about the trio getting whacked. I had a tiny bit but it was based entirely on external factors rather than the books themselves. Reading it cold was more like watching certain kinds of action movies.
Pre-book, I did imagine lots of tasty possibilities involving more personal darkness and redemption than the characters had to deal with. But I think that's a reflection of the sort of thing I want to write rather than anything supported by the previous books. And I didn't imagine just how snarky she made Snape to Dumbledore so it kind of balanced.
I wonder if Draco was reprieved from epilogue doom because she wanted to make a point about how he wasn't going to pull a Kenshin (or a Kreacher) no matter how much he was saved.
I am currently thinking she had a lot of 'points to make' and maybe they didn't end up working so well on some segment of readers. But that could just be because I'd try to do that kind of thing. Or would have, before thinking these thoughts. Hmmm.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 10:56 pm (UTC)THat's another thing that bothers me. Why the FUCK haven't we heard of this Grindelwald guy before? You'd think that the defeat of the second most powerful dark wizard in history would warrant a mention on his Chocolate Frog card, but if memory serves it did not.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 11:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 10:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 11:01 pm (UTC)I really wanted that experience here in DH and when I didn't get it, well first I was pissed, then just sad. But, again, there's still fanfiction and I'm quite certain this book is going to infuse a whole lot of writers with boat loads of inspiration. Those who loved it remaining strictly in cannon, and those who didn't spinning stories to "fix" what they didn't enjoy.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 11:07 pm (UTC)Has the fanfic world branched out into plays and radio dramas and other things aimed at being shared aloud?
no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 11:14 pm (UTC)Well it had back in the Xena days, but I'm not sure about HP, I suspect so, though. The only recordings I have related to this series are a couple of presentations on Snape from the Lumos convention last year. I'm curious, though, all I've seen so far are podcasts...
BTW, if you do fanfic at all and would like to see a really good representation of how I would've loved to see Snape's redemption story go down, I highly recommend: Summon the Lambs to Slaughter (http://www.schnoogle.com/authorLinks/La_Guera/Summon_The_Lambs_To_Slaughter/)
no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 11:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 11:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-24 02:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-24 03:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-24 03:24 am (UTC)But I could see that being a load of fun. The only problem is, it falls apart if you can't get enough people doing readings. =/
no subject
Date: 2007-07-24 04:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-24 03:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 11:15 pm (UTC)Me? I admire the fuck out of anyone willing to take a risk. I adore George R.R. Martin for killing off the main character 1/3 the way through his first book in the Song of Ice and Fire series. As much as I loved Xander, I was proud of Joss for maiming him. JKR could have done that, easily, to Ron or Hermione. She could have taken some risk. Instead she killed off two characters that, to be frank, I'd never been given any reason to like (Hedwig and Dobby) with quite a bit of gnashing of teeth, then killed two characters I cared a great deal about without any emotion whatsoever (Remus and Tonks).
Fred and Snape, I thought she handled well, though I would have liked a bit more time with Snape's death (though, for me, that's true of all of his scenes). And I would have kissed her feet if Snape too had appeared after he used the Stone of Resurrection.
Huh, and I thought I didn't want to talk about the book....
no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 11:40 pm (UTC)<3<3<3
Love ASoIaF. For exactly that reason.
Honestly, even if it's not a character death, it's always awesome when an author keeps you guessing until the last minute.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 11:49 pm (UTC)Keeps you guessing through deft, well thought out plot twists, yes, but not by withholding information or having characters just suddenly understand something out of the blue. I'm a huge Sherlock Holmes fan, and yet I'll admit there were several stories where Doyle withheld too much because you'd figure the mystery out pretty damn quickly if he didn't. It annoyed the hell out of me. But at least I could forgive it a little because it was being told first person by a guy who wasn't exactly the most observant human being on the planet.
Fair enough.
But there's no reason we couldn't have gotten a more nuanced version of Dumbledore's past a while ago. No reason it couldn't have been well known and mentioned that Snape was friends with Lily, etc., etc. If the storyteller is deft enough they can afford to give you these clues well in advance and still manage to keep you guessing. Sometimes JKR can manage to do that (I thought the reveal in HBP was great, she'd given us all the clues we needed to figure it out but enough red herrings to make us wonder right up to the end), but she didn't even seem to try in this one, which was sad.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-24 01:49 am (UTC)