ebonlock: (Monarch)
From Romney's speech last night:

"Freedom requires religion just as religion requires freedom"

Excuse me? Sally Quinn's interesting and accurate response:

QUINN: I have to say that I'm really stunned because I think it was an obliteration of the idea of the separation of church and state. He eliminated anybody who was a doubter, an atheist, an agnostic, a seeker. It's like, if you believe in God or Christ, you're on my side. If not, you're not.


Bingo. Though my favorite response comes from Barbara at Mahablog:

Millennia of human history in which religion did just fine without freedom are cheerfully ignored.
ebonlock: (Monarch)
Did somebody forget to tell me that we now use religious affiliation quotas when it comes to governmental jobs? No? Hmm, perhaps they forgot to tell Mr. Romney:

I asked Mr. Romney whether he would consider including qualified Americans of the Islamic faith in his cabinet as advisers on national security matters, given his position that "jihadism" is the principal foreign policy threat facing America today. He answered, "…based on the numbers of American Muslims [as a percentage] in our population, I cannot see that a cabinet position would be justified. But of course, I would imagine that Muslims could serve at lower levels of my administration."


To which I can only reply, Article VI of the Constitution of the United States: "no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States."

BTW, last I checked the Mormons weren't that much more plentiful than the Muslims in this country, and according to some surveys even less plentiful. Just sayin'...

Profile

ebonlock: (Default)
ebonlock

August 2013

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728 293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 7th, 2026 04:56 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios