Fearless on my breath...

Sure we've all had fun at Dick's expense over the past few days. I mean it's easy to be distracted when the vice president shoots a 78 year old man...In. The. Face. Particularly when it now seems likely that ol' DUI Dick was hitting the sauce before he went out to blast a few birdies to smithereens. But it's high time to refocus on the bigger scandal, folks, sure it's less entertaining and doesn't lend itself to such amusing Elmer Fudd jokes, but it's, you know, about the president breaking the law. Senator Byrd just unleashed a volley on C-Span that should help with that:

…We cannot continue to claim that we are a nation of laws and not of men if our laws and, indeed, even the Constitution of the United States itself, may by summarily breached because of some determination of expediency or because the President says “trust me.”
[...]
…In the name of “fighting terror” are we to sacrifice every freedom to a President’s demand? How far are we to go? Can a President order warrantless house-by-house searches of a neighborhood, where he suspects a terrorist may be hiding? Can he impose new restrictions on what can be printed, broadcast, or even uttered privately, because of some perceived threat to national security? Laughable thoughts? I think not. For this Administration has so traumatized the people of this nation -- and many in the Congress -- that some will swallow whole whatever rubbish that is spewed from this White House, as long as it is in some tenuous way connected to the so-called war on terror.
[...]
…I plead with the American public to tune-in to what is happening in this country. Please forget the political party with which you may usually be associated, and, instead, think about the right of due process, the presumption of innocence, and the right to a private life. Forget the now tired political spin that, if one does not support warrant-less spying, then one may be a bosom buddy of Osama Bin Laden.
[...]
…There is a need for a thorough investigation of all of our domestic spying programs. We have to know what is being done, by whom, and to whom. We need to know if the Federal Intelligence Surveillance Act has been breached, and if the Constitutional rights of thousands of Americans have been violated without cause.
[...]
…I want to know how many Americans have been spied upon. I want to know how it is determined which individuals are monitored and who makes such determinations. I want to know if the telecommunications industry is involved in a massive screening of the domestic telephone calls of ordinary Americans. I want to know if the United States Post Office is involved. I want to know if the law has been broken and the Constitution has been breached.

And if you get the chance I highly recommend taking a look at Glenn Greenwald's latest post on why this scandal is, or should be, a winner for the Democratic party.