ebonlock: (Bollocks!)
[personal profile] ebonlock
I smell a Medal of Freedom coming on...

A proposal to keep seriously wounded vets from falling through the cracks of the bureaucracy was shelved in 2005 when Jim Nicholson took over as the secretary of the Veterans Affairs Department, according to the former VA employee who was responsible for tracking war casualties.

As a result, seriously wounded veterans continued to face long delays for health care and benefit payments after being discharged from the military, says former VA program manager Paul Sullivan.

The program, called the Contingency Tracking System, had been approved by Nicholson's predecessor but died once Nicholson took over the VA, Sullivan told ABC News.

Sullivan said he was told the cost of the system -- less than $1 million to build and requiring a handful of staff to maintain -- was prohibitive.


When asked about the Contingency Tracking System at the White House Wednesday, Nicholson told ABC News, "I'm not sure I know what program you're referring to." He added that "when the VA gets patients...we instantly create an electronic medical record for them."

In testimony before Congress today, a VA official confirmed that its current tracking system still depends on paper files and lacks the ability to download Department of Defense records into its computers, a key flaw originally identified as leading to veterans getting lost between the cracks.

[...]

Yesterday, President Bush put VA Secretary Nicholson in charge of an interagency task force to determine what can be done to deliver benefits and health care now to thousands of wounded vets who have struggled to receive care.


But wait, it gets better...

The committee wants to learn more about a letter written in September by Garrison Commander Peter Garibaldi to Weightman.

The memorandum “describes how the Army’s decision to privatize support services at Walter Reed Army Medical Center was causing an exodus of ‘highly skilled and experienced personnel,’” the committee’s letter states. “According to multiple sources, the decision to privatize support services at Walter Reed led to a precipitous drop in support personnel at Walter Reed.”

The letter said Walter Reed also awarded a five-year, $120-million contract to IAP Worldwide Services, which is run by Al Neffgen, a former senior Halliburton official.

They also found that more than 300 federal employees providing facilities management services at Walter Reed had drooped to fewer than 60 by Feb. 3, 2007, the day before IAP took over facilities management. IAP replaced the remaining 60 employees with only 50 private workers.

“The conditions that have been described at Walter Reed are disgraceful,” the letter states. “Part of our mission on the Oversight Committee is to investigate what led to the breakdown in services. It would be reprehensible if the deplorable conditions were caused or aggravated by an ideological commitment to privatize government services regardless of the costs to taxpayers and the consequences for wounded soldiers.

The letter said the Defense Department “systemically” tried to replace federal workers at Walter Reed with private companies for facilities management, patient care and guard duty – a process that began in 2000.

“But the push to privatize support services there accelerated under President Bush’s ‘competitive sourcing’ initiative, which was launched in 2002,” the letter states.

During the year between awarding the contract to IAP and when the company started, “skilled government workers apparently began leaving Walter Reed in droves,” the letter states. “The memorandum also indicates that officials at the highest levels of Walter Reed and the U.S. Army Medical Command were informed about the dangers of privatization, but appeared to do little to prevent them.”


I'm sorry, someone remind me, which party is it that's supposed to support the troops?

Date: 2007-03-08 10:18 pm (UTC)
ext_124685: (Owl)
From: [identity profile] ebongreen.livejournal.com
The party whose representatives don't tell oversight committees of problems at the hospital of which they have personal knowledge.

I'm pretty jaded - to remain semi-sane, it's required. And yet, I would ask him: "You'd rather not embarrass the dead? HOW THE HELL IS THAT GOING TO HELP THE LIVING, MAN???"

Date: 2007-03-08 10:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ebonlock.livejournal.com
Good christ, I wish I could still find the energy to even vaguely hope that this would have some sort of negative impact on the Bush administration, but I've already repeated the "Surely this..." phrase so often it exhausts me just to think about it. I mean they've gotten away with Katrina, so...

Date: 2007-03-09 02:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] phillipalden.livejournal.com
The reality is "Support the Military-Industrial Complex and fuck the troops."

Only an idiot would ever believe the Bush Administration gives a damn about anyone but themselves and their wealthy corporate buddies. They never cared about the troops and they never will.

And that goes for the hypocritical Democrats as well. They're all self-serving assholes.

Date: 2007-03-09 07:15 am (UTC)
ext_73044: Tinkerbell (Default)
From: [identity profile] lisa-marli.livejournal.com
And that is what the Republicans want you to believe.
If you think they are all the same, you won't vote democratic but some off brand, they will have all their right wing nuts vote for them and win again!
It's worked pretty well so far...

Date: 2007-03-12 12:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] phillipalden.livejournal.com
I vote for Democrats because I have no viable choices until people start to realize that there are more than two political parties.

But the Democrats enable the military-industrial complex as much as the Republicans do.

Profile

ebonlock: (Default)
ebonlock

August 2013

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728 293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 5th, 2026 04:36 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios