So Sixpence None the Richer have done a cover of "Don't Dream it's Over". They took what was a lovely ballad and sucked all the life and emotion out of it. Rather like Whitney Houston's cover of "Colors of the Wind". I just sighed when I heard it this morning and have been playing the Crowded House original in my mind ever since.
The songs of my youth are being "covered" now, I feel so ancient.
And my computer at work is misbehaving again. If I had a baseball bat I'd beat the thing down to its component parts, and then I'd stomp on those for good measure. The system is either "ok" or it's dropping network for no goddman reason at all. And even ok is starting to piss me off. I'm sure some people would label it "quirky", to me it's more "If you don't cut this shit out I'm going to heave you out the nearest window!".
Grrr.
And what was one of the first things I read this morning? Here's a little hint:
Chipping Away at Roe
Well, looks like the fundies are getting what they want after all. Excuse me while I find a nice quiet, secluded place to vomit.
There, much better.
I could spend the morning posting links here, begging you all to read up on the subject, sign petitions, do something...but I'm just too heartsick to do it. I'll wail to the heavens tomorrow, today I need to think about what this means to me, what it means to my future. It scares me, I won't deny that, it sickens me, it makes me angry too.
I grew up knowing my body and my reproductive organs were my own, to do with as I saw fit. That may no longer be entirely true. I can't be trusted, apparently, with my body's own ability to create life.
It's just one procedure, many will say, but it opens the door, and what's beyond that door should terrify every woman of childbearing age. And if you don't think about this, don't educate yourself, don't work against what may be coming, then you will have no one to blame but yourself when you lose the right to choose.
The songs of my youth are being "covered" now, I feel so ancient.
And my computer at work is misbehaving again. If I had a baseball bat I'd beat the thing down to its component parts, and then I'd stomp on those for good measure. The system is either "ok" or it's dropping network for no goddman reason at all. And even ok is starting to piss me off. I'm sure some people would label it "quirky", to me it's more "If you don't cut this shit out I'm going to heave you out the nearest window!".
Grrr.
And what was one of the first things I read this morning? Here's a little hint:
Chipping Away at Roe
Well, looks like the fundies are getting what they want after all. Excuse me while I find a nice quiet, secluded place to vomit.
There, much better.
I could spend the morning posting links here, begging you all to read up on the subject, sign petitions, do something...but I'm just too heartsick to do it. I'll wail to the heavens tomorrow, today I need to think about what this means to me, what it means to my future. It scares me, I won't deny that, it sickens me, it makes me angry too.
I grew up knowing my body and my reproductive organs were my own, to do with as I saw fit. That may no longer be entirely true. I can't be trusted, apparently, with my body's own ability to create life.
It's just one procedure, many will say, but it opens the door, and what's beyond that door should terrify every woman of childbearing age. And if you don't think about this, don't educate yourself, don't work against what may be coming, then you will have no one to blame but yourself when you lose the right to choose.
no subject
Date: 2003-03-13 11:08 am (UTC)That means that for all the sound and fury, the law could have no practical impact. Even some on the right wonder why abortion opponents have spent so much energy on it. Mark Crutcher, of the anti-abortion group Life Dynamics, says the partial-birth fight has allowed politicians to take a public stand without any real consequences. “Bush gets to play pro-life without having to do anything pro-life,” he says.
D&X accounted for 0.17% of all procedures last year. This law will pass, it will be signed. It will be challenged in court. It will be struck down.
I'm not saying that you shouldn't make gestures like contacting your Congresscritter (Anna Eshoo -- she will already vote against this anyway), but it doesn't sound like the beginning of the end of legal abortion as we know it.
no subject
Date: 2003-03-13 11:18 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-03-13 11:24 am (UTC)I'm not saying that you shouldn't make gestures like contacting your Congresscritter (Anna Eshoo -- she will already vote against this anyway), but it doesn't sound like the beginning of the end of legal abortion as we know it.
Maybe it is, maybe it isn't, but I think the proponents of the law are pretty clear that they see this as a major victory against abortion as a whole. They are at least up front about their goals where this is concerned, and I'm taking that into consideration.
no subject
Date: 2003-03-13 12:23 pm (UTC)I don't think this particular policy point has ever been "veiled" by the anti-choice folks. Yes, they're happy. Yay for us, look what we did, but again, they're all mostly cheering because they haven't had much to cheer about since 1974.
Re:
Date: 2003-03-13 01:09 pm (UTC)If I assume that the actual motions for this law are obviously futile, I would guess that the proponents are trying to convince people that it's a major victory. Social truth does not correspond to actual truth, but it still can be effective in furthering one's goals--especially when there are so many people out there who won't (for whatever reason) think for themselves.
I do believe it's my turn to say, "Testify" *G*
no subject
Date: 2003-03-13 12:14 pm (UTC)My body, my choice. Why in god's name would anyone want a child brought into the world by a mother who doesn't want it?
no subject
Date: 2003-03-13 12:25 pm (UTC)Hey, I resemble that remark.
I can sum up my philosophy about abortion in three words: legal, safe, infrequent. If push came to shove -- and I mean a real sea change on abortion -- I'd be willing to do what I could to effect change back to where we are now.
Re:
Date: 2003-03-13 01:08 pm (UTC)I'm going to hold you to that, dear };)
no subject
Date: 2003-03-13 11:20 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-03-13 11:34 am (UTC)Bless you, dear, that's kind of what I was hoping to hear from at least one of the guys commenting on this post. This whole thing may not seem frightening to most folks, hey, it's just a single procedure done quite infrequently; but listen to what the people who are behind this law really want. They see this as a stepping stone to undoing Roe v. Wade, I'm not saying this, they are.
There is an agenda at work here, that goes far beyond a single procedure, and it's an agenda that scares the piss out of me.
no subject
Date: 2003-03-13 02:22 pm (UTC)I found out yesterday that a woman I knew in high school is pregnant with her fifth child. What makes people think that huge families like that are a good idea in the modern age?
Re:
Date: 2003-03-13 02:57 pm (UTC)Not just birth control, but sex education too, lest we forget. Sadly these folks didn't seem to catch onto the concept that the "Just say no" campaign on drugs didn't work. Abstinence, it's what's for dinner.
no subject
Date: 2003-03-13 03:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-13 01:03 pm (UTC)One of the oddest conversations I ever had involved my (then) 60 year old staunchly Republican father saying much the same thing. For him, it's a woman's issue and something men have no right mucking with. OTOH, simply *because* it's a "female thing", I doubt very much he even pays attention to abortion laws, or that he would make any kind of a political stand should the the right to choose be taken away.
no subject
Date: 2003-03-13 12:17 pm (UTC)Dixie Chicks, Landslide.
RALPH.
no subject
Date: 2003-03-13 02:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-13 01:08 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-03-13 01:12 pm (UTC)It's very hard to empathize with this fear because, in this case, there is no male equivalent. The concept that a part of their body might be under the control of the state is so utterly foreign to them. I'm happy for them, I mean it's a hideous concept that they won't ever have to deal with, but at the same time I find it quite frustrating. Being told, "You have no reason to fear" isn't really helpful.
no subject
Date: 2003-03-13 03:05 pm (UTC)If men had to give birth, abortion would be in the Bill of Rights. And the state would pay for birth control. I don't doubt it for a second.
no subject
Date: 2003-03-13 04:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-13 11:57 pm (UTC)However, the songs of your childhood have been getting covered for many years now. 10000 Maniacs did a cover of 'Every Day is Like Sunday' back in the early '90s. Tom Jones' cover of 'Lust for Life' is actually, in its goofy straight ahead enthusiasm, cheesily fun. There's the Quentin Tarver version of 'When Doves Cry' and the Broadbent/Roxburgh 'Like a Virgin' from Luhrmann films....