Is the Kool-Aid wearing off?
Dec. 19th, 2005 02:10 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
ebonlockYou be the judge:
…Well, the fact of the matter is that the Constitution is the Constitution, and I took an oath to abide by it. My good friend, my former colleague, Dana Rohrabacher, did and the president did. And I don’t really care very much whether or not it can be justified based on some hypothetical. The fact of the matter is that, if you have any government official who deliberately orders that federal law be violated despite the best of motives, that certainly ought to be of concern to us…
…Well, gee, I guess then the president should be able to ignore whatever provision in the Constitution as long as there’s something after the fact that justifies it…
…The fact of the matter is the law prohibits — specifically prohibits — what apparently was done in this case, and for a member of Congress to say, oh, that doesn’t matter, I’m proud that the president violated the law is absolutely astounding, Wolf…
Now, can you guess who said this in regards to Bush spying on the American public? Michael Moore, you say? Nope. Al Franken. Sorry, no cigar. But for those who guessed former Rep. Bob Barr (R-GA), ultra-conservative who hates him some gays and abortions, you win today's boobie prize (a virtual noogie for being such a know it all). Methinks Daddy Cheney had best check the formula on the mind-control drugs being freely distributed to all members of the GOP to keep them in such lock-step harmony. Something seems to be amiss.
via Shakespeare's Sister
…Well, the fact of the matter is that the Constitution is the Constitution, and I took an oath to abide by it. My good friend, my former colleague, Dana Rohrabacher, did and the president did. And I don’t really care very much whether or not it can be justified based on some hypothetical. The fact of the matter is that, if you have any government official who deliberately orders that federal law be violated despite the best of motives, that certainly ought to be of concern to us…
…Well, gee, I guess then the president should be able to ignore whatever provision in the Constitution as long as there’s something after the fact that justifies it…
…The fact of the matter is the law prohibits — specifically prohibits — what apparently was done in this case, and for a member of Congress to say, oh, that doesn’t matter, I’m proud that the president violated the law is absolutely astounding, Wolf…
Now, can you guess who said this in regards to Bush spying on the American public? Michael Moore, you say? Nope. Al Franken. Sorry, no cigar. But for those who guessed former Rep. Bob Barr (R-GA), ultra-conservative who hates him some gays and abortions, you win today's boobie prize (a virtual noogie for being such a know it all). Methinks Daddy Cheney had best check the formula on the mind-control drugs being freely distributed to all members of the GOP to keep them in such lock-step harmony. Something seems to be amiss.
via Shakespeare's Sister
no subject
Date: 2005-12-19 11:56 pm (UTC)Except when he backs them up on the "Marriage Protection Act" and lauds the pro-lifers, yes? :)
no subject
Date: 2005-12-20 12:05 am (UTC)Clearly the Kool-Aid is still functioning well enough on the Freepers at least.