"In my defense it was dark, I was drunk, and it was...delicious."

Joining today's meme to wish aelfsciene a happy birthday, though I suspect I'll be doing so again tonight when she arrives.

Have I mentioned lately how much I continue to worship namaah_darling as a writer? No? Well, here's what prompted today's recurring threat to build her an altar:

Okay, scratch that. As suspicions go, this is about as sneaky as a Ninja with Tourette's wearing an outfit made solely out of hot pink keychains.

That mental image alone could get me through even the worst of times with a smile on my face.

Dinner with elo_sf was splendid last night and I had the best burrito ever created in the history of wrapped Mexican food. Even E- was in awe of it. Only the certainty that I'd pay (oh god how I'd pay) for all that cheesey goodness made me stop. Yum! Then we headed for BookBuyers so he could procure copies of Twelfth Night and we parted with hugs and promises to try and do this sort of thing more often. Made it home in time for the Daily Show and nearly broke something laughing. I love it when Stephen Colbert manages to break Jon so thoroughly that the latter can't even look at him. Stephen always gets this twinkle in his eyes when he knows he's caused Jon to lose it, the man just eats it up. And the shoutout to Atrios of Eschaton was sweet. And Ted Hitler...oh sweet lord.

What can I say about Alan Cumming except that my love for him grows by the day? It is, of necessity, a platonic love, but still... "Cumming the Fragrance" indeed, though my personal favorites were the body lotion "Cumming All Over" and the candles "Cumming in the Air". Love this man, love him to death!

I need to read some smut this weekend, preferably either Snupin or BSG smut definitely involving Starbuck, my new pretend t.v. girlfriend.

Why can't we have politicians like this?

Address by Prime Minister Paul Martin on Bill C-38 (The Civil Marriage Act)
A few snippets to whet your appetite:

There have been a number of arguments put forward by those who do not support this bill. It’s important and respectful to examine them and to assess them.

First, some have claimed that, once this bill becomes law, religious freedoms will be less than fully protected. This is demonstrably untrue. As it pertains to marriage, the government’s legislation affirms the Charter guarantee: that religious officials are free to perform such ceremonies in accordance with the beliefs of their faith.

In this, we are guided by the ruling of the Supreme Court of Canada, which makes clear that in no church, no synagogue, no mosque, no temple – in no religious house will those who disagree with same-sex unions be compelled to perform them. Period. That is why this legislation is about civil marriage, not religious marriage.

Moreover -- and this is crucially important – the Supreme Court has declared unanimously, and I quote: “The guarantee of religious freedom in section 2(a) of the Charter is broad enough to protect religious officials from being compelled by the state to perform civil or religious same-sex marriages that are contrary to their religious beliefs.”

The facts are plain: Religious leaders who preside over marriage ceremonies must and will be guided by what they believe. If they do not wish to celebrate marriages for same-sex couples, that is their right. The Supreme Court says so. And the Charter says so.
[...]
We embrace freedom and equality in theory, Mr. Speaker. We must also embrace them in fact.

Third, some have counseled the government to extend to gays and lesbians the right to “civil union.” This would give same-sex couples many of the rights of a wedded couple, but their relationships would not legally be considered marriage. In other words, they would be equal, but not quite as equal as the rest of Canadians.

Mr. Speaker, the courts have clearly and consistently ruled that this option would offend the equality provisions of the Charter. For instance, the British Columbia Court of Appeal stated that, and I quote: “Marriage is the only road to true equality for same-sex couples. Any other form of recognition of same-sex relationships ...falls short of true equality.”

Put simply, we must always remember that “separate but equal” is not equal.


Please go read the rest, it's absolutely brilliant and guaranteed to put a smile on your face.