(no subject)
Jun. 16th, 2006 09:23 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
ebonlockIsn't this just adorable?
Democrats Behave Like Sunni Insurgents
I've been wondering why there is something familiar about the behavior of the Sunni insurgency in Iraq, and suddenly it dawned on me that we have our own similar insurgency right here at home -- it is called the Democrat Party.
Think about it. Both are operating under the same motivation -- an unrequited lust for lost power. And both will do just about anything to retrieve it....
Saddam may have ordered the atrocities, but it was the Sunnis who carried them out, torturing, beheading and otherwise brutalizing the Shia and the Kurds and looting the nation's treasure.
They were very well compensated for their services -- and since being ousted by the U.S. invasion and the deposing of their benefactor they have been unable to accept their current powerlessness. They are, as the liberals like to say, "in denial." They just can't live with their loss of authority and act as if they can somehow regain what they lost by mounting an insurgency against the new Iraqi government....
Like the Sunni insurgency in Iraq, the Democrats cannot accept their minority status....
Like the Sunni insurgency, the national Democrat Party and its congressional contingent has demonstrated time and again that they will willingly sacrifice the welfare and security of the American people to get their way.
...In the end, all that matters to them is regaining the power the American people took from them in 1994, and, thank God, have kept it out of their hands ever since.
via No More Mister Nice Blog
That's Michael Reagan referring to all Dems as basically insurgents. As terrorists. Do you suppose this is a sort of wingnut mating ritual, using outrageous and slanderous comments about the Dems in order to make himself more appealing to Ann Coulter? It would explain so much.
For more mating calls of the wild wingnut, I point you to Retardo Montalbon's thorough savaging of paste eater Jeff Goldstein:
To the casual observer, Goldstein might seem to be a garden-variety internet wingnut, a suburban douchebag whose sad and petty hatreds, frustrations over stagnated ambitions and innate cowardice lead him to adopt a sort of Walter-Mitty-As-Rambo-As-Whackjob-Blogger schtick, whereby all his fantasies of action and genocidal crusade and manly-man aggression are sated through internet jackassery...although Goldstein has a curiously ambitious drive to be the biggest jerk of them all, and he very nearly succeeds. Added to this drive and his deep, abiding fear that he might be a weenie is his status as “Literature Wingnut” and the unique salad of sex and violence issues which reside in his otherwise empty brainpan; Goldstein’s a hell of a case study.
His sex and violence issues I’ll deal with first; if by the end you’re not also convinced that Goldstein is certifably crazy and that, therefore, he ought to be straitjacketed and shot-up with elephant tranquilizers, then you should be drubbed to death with a giant dildo.
Do check out the comments if you get the chance, my own favorite bit was the troll defense that actually dragged poor Hunter S Thompson into the fray. I'm afraid you'll just have to read it to believe it.
Democrats Behave Like Sunni Insurgents
I've been wondering why there is something familiar about the behavior of the Sunni insurgency in Iraq, and suddenly it dawned on me that we have our own similar insurgency right here at home -- it is called the Democrat Party.
Think about it. Both are operating under the same motivation -- an unrequited lust for lost power. And both will do just about anything to retrieve it....
Saddam may have ordered the atrocities, but it was the Sunnis who carried them out, torturing, beheading and otherwise brutalizing the Shia and the Kurds and looting the nation's treasure.
They were very well compensated for their services -- and since being ousted by the U.S. invasion and the deposing of their benefactor they have been unable to accept their current powerlessness. They are, as the liberals like to say, "in denial." They just can't live with their loss of authority and act as if they can somehow regain what they lost by mounting an insurgency against the new Iraqi government....
Like the Sunni insurgency in Iraq, the Democrats cannot accept their minority status....
Like the Sunni insurgency, the national Democrat Party and its congressional contingent has demonstrated time and again that they will willingly sacrifice the welfare and security of the American people to get their way.
...In the end, all that matters to them is regaining the power the American people took from them in 1994, and, thank God, have kept it out of their hands ever since.
via No More Mister Nice Blog
That's Michael Reagan referring to all Dems as basically insurgents. As terrorists. Do you suppose this is a sort of wingnut mating ritual, using outrageous and slanderous comments about the Dems in order to make himself more appealing to Ann Coulter? It would explain so much.
For more mating calls of the wild wingnut, I point you to Retardo Montalbon's thorough savaging of paste eater Jeff Goldstein:
To the casual observer, Goldstein might seem to be a garden-variety internet wingnut, a suburban douchebag whose sad and petty hatreds, frustrations over stagnated ambitions and innate cowardice lead him to adopt a sort of Walter-Mitty-As-Rambo-As-Whackjob-Blogger schtick, whereby all his fantasies of action and genocidal crusade and manly-man aggression are sated through internet jackassery...although Goldstein has a curiously ambitious drive to be the biggest jerk of them all, and he very nearly succeeds. Added to this drive and his deep, abiding fear that he might be a weenie is his status as “Literature Wingnut” and the unique salad of sex and violence issues which reside in his otherwise empty brainpan; Goldstein’s a hell of a case study.
His sex and violence issues I’ll deal with first; if by the end you’re not also convinced that Goldstein is certifably crazy and that, therefore, he ought to be straitjacketed and shot-up with elephant tranquilizers, then you should be drubbed to death with a giant dildo.
Do check out the comments if you get the chance, my own favorite bit was the troll defense that actually dragged poor Hunter S Thompson into the fray. I'm afraid you'll just have to read it to believe it.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
This may just be the unbridled rage talking...
Date: 2006-06-16 08:02 pm (UTC)Except that doesn't work, because terrorism is when you scare people, not give them an excuse for a three-day drunkfest party...
Re: This may just be the unbridled rage talking...
Date: 2006-06-16 08:18 pm (UTC)