![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Aug. 30th, 2005 10:03 amAn interesting piece on the difference in perspective on Iraq on the Right and Left:
The right (broadly speaking) can’t fathom why the left is driven into fits of rage over every Abu Ghraib, every Gitmo, every secret rendition, every breach of civil liberties, every shifting rationale for war, every soldier and civilian killed in that war, every Bush platitude in support of it, every attempt to squelch dissent. They see the left's protestations as appeasement of a ruthless enemy. For the left (broadly speaking), America’s moral strength is of paramount importance; without it, all the brute force in the world won’t keep us safe, defeat our enemies, and preserve our role as the world’s moral leader.....
War hawks squeal about America-haters and traitors, heaping scorn on the so-called “blame America first" crowd, but they fail to comprehend that the left reserves the deepest disdain for those who squander our moral authority. The scars of a terrorist attack heal and we are sadder but stronger for having lived through it. When our moral leadership is compromised by people draped in the American flag, America is weakened. The loss of our moral compass leaves us rudderless, open to attacks on our character and our basic decency. And nothing makes our enemies prouder. They can't kill us all, but if they permanently stain our dignity, they've done irreparable harm to America.
And a Jesse at Pandagon discusses this same basic idea in regards to Dennis Prager's latest yap:
A note to Dennis Prager: don't feed me this shit.
You don't think there's a fucking right to be anti-war. If you did, you'd realize that the mainstream of the anti-war movement believes that the terrorists are evil, but their evilness does not justify our fuckups. Our actions are not made de facto good or positive by the fact that they are targeted against people who are evil if said actions either increase the threat from evil or are evil themselves (see Abu Ghraib, for instance).
Even if every single anti-war person wore a shirt at all times that said "terrorism is evil", they would still be accused of being traitors to the nation because they opposed the action we were taking to "get them". It's not my fucking job as an opponent of the war to make sure that your delicate little sensibilities are massaged, that your he-man mega-Christian "I'm fighting the war on the homefront" ass can live out your fantasies of not fighting in World War II.
The right (broadly speaking) can’t fathom why the left is driven into fits of rage over every Abu Ghraib, every Gitmo, every secret rendition, every breach of civil liberties, every shifting rationale for war, every soldier and civilian killed in that war, every Bush platitude in support of it, every attempt to squelch dissent. They see the left's protestations as appeasement of a ruthless enemy. For the left (broadly speaking), America’s moral strength is of paramount importance; without it, all the brute force in the world won’t keep us safe, defeat our enemies, and preserve our role as the world’s moral leader.....
War hawks squeal about America-haters and traitors, heaping scorn on the so-called “blame America first" crowd, but they fail to comprehend that the left reserves the deepest disdain for those who squander our moral authority. The scars of a terrorist attack heal and we are sadder but stronger for having lived through it. When our moral leadership is compromised by people draped in the American flag, America is weakened. The loss of our moral compass leaves us rudderless, open to attacks on our character and our basic decency. And nothing makes our enemies prouder. They can't kill us all, but if they permanently stain our dignity, they've done irreparable harm to America.
And a Jesse at Pandagon discusses this same basic idea in regards to Dennis Prager's latest yap:
A note to Dennis Prager: don't feed me this shit.
You don't think there's a fucking right to be anti-war. If you did, you'd realize that the mainstream of the anti-war movement believes that the terrorists are evil, but their evilness does not justify our fuckups. Our actions are not made de facto good or positive by the fact that they are targeted against people who are evil if said actions either increase the threat from evil or are evil themselves (see Abu Ghraib, for instance).
Even if every single anti-war person wore a shirt at all times that said "terrorism is evil", they would still be accused of being traitors to the nation because they opposed the action we were taking to "get them". It's not my fucking job as an opponent of the war to make sure that your delicate little sensibilities are massaged, that your he-man mega-Christian "I'm fighting the war on the homefront" ass can live out your fantasies of not fighting in World War II.
